This view is later supported by Fisher et al (1996) with particular concern in terms of the test–retest reliabilities of the test. a number of commercial organisations and management consultancies use it not only in training courses but in actual team building and development”(Furnham, 1993b) As such he argues that the reliability and validity of the test is questionable. This he argues is based on his observation of the use of the inventory “. It has also been argued that the role model is relevant to a static business environment but not so in times of rapid change and fluidity in business.įurnham’s work focuses on his concerns that the BTRSPI is taken and utilised as a psychometric test, which effectively allocates a role. In addition to Furnham’s observations, the definitions of the 8 roles and the construction of the team role model were questioned by Brouek and Randall (1996) and Fisher,Macrosson & Sharp(1996). Thirdly he raised concern given the measure was neither theoretically nor empirically derived. He also questioned the way the questions were asked which could “easily lead to poor reliability”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |